ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025
Long-term outcome after perioperative chemotherapy and surgery for gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of recurrent gastro-oesophageal adeno-carcinoma after perioperative chemotherapy and radical resection.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The long-term fate of patients treated for resectable gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma with perioperative chemotherapy outside randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is poorly described. In this national cohort, we report on outcomes after 12 years. Materials and methods: Baseline clinicopathological factors and blood tests were collected in 285 patients treated from May 2008 to June 2010, and postsurgical factors were collected in the 202 patients that were radically resected. Response to preoperative chemotherapy was assessed by postsurgical restaging. Additional information on second cancers, comorbidities, and competing causes of death was obtained. Results: Overall survival (OS) at 5 and 10 years was 31.9% and 24.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis (MA) showed prognostic value of clinical T- and N-stage, dysphagia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Elevated leucocytes and lactate dehydrogenase, and low lymphocytes were additional adverse prognostic factors. Ten-year incidence rate of second cancers was 10.1%.OS at 5 and 10 years from radical surgery was 43.1% and 32.1%, respectively. MA showed prognostic value of postneoadjuvant pathological (yp) Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage and downstaging. However, downstaging was strongly correlated with clinical stage. At the 5-year landmark, marginally significant trends toward a favorable recurrence-free survival were associated with ypT0 and age <70 years, but only 3.4% experienced late recurrences. Postoperative complications caused a quarter of deaths in the half of radically resected patients who died without recurrence. Conclusions: Five-year OS was 4%-6% points inferior to RCTs. Pretreatment white blood cell counts, but not postoperative, could supplement clinical prognostic factors. Downstaging by preoperative chemotherapy was prognostic but correlated strongly with pretreatment clinical stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.