Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646219›Full record

ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2025

Data-centric artificial intelligence and cancer research: construction of a real-world head and neck treatment data repository.

V Butterworth, T Young, H Drake, I Palmer, T Avgoulea, E Ivy, J Andriolo, C Creppy, C Routledge, D Adjogatse and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

V ButterworthGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
T YoungGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
H DrakeGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
I PalmerKing's College London, London, UK.
T AvgouleaGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
E IvyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
J AndrioloGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
C CreppyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
C RoutledgeGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
D AdjogatseGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
A KongGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
I PetkarGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
M Reis FerreiraGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
D EatonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
M LeiGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
S MissonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
D VilicGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.
T Guerrero UrbanoGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: The performance and generalisability of machine learning (ML) models relies on high-quality data. Retrospective and prospective collection of high-quality data for research use while respecting data protection and patient privacy remains a challenge in the clinical environment. Currently, months of laborious extraction and clinical annotation are often necessary before data analysis can begin. We present a novel institutional federated data lake, utilising open-source software, to facilitate efficient production of ML models from head and neck cancer (HNC) imaging and radiotherapy (RT) data. This structured pipeline dramatically reduces the time associated with the production of ML models and real-world evidence generation. This paper describes our governance-compliant processes and provides a framework for establishing similar databases. Materials and methods: Extensible NeuroImaging Archival Toolkit (XNAT) is a powerful open-source imaging platform. Within our department, it forms a part of the local secure enclave for the purposes of federated learning in artificial intelligence projects and provides import, archiving, processing, search and secure distribution facilities for imaging and RT data. Results: We have created a clinically annotated, carefully curated, data lake of 2895 consenting HNC patients containing 22 170 relevant diagnostic, staging, treatment and monitoring imaging sets. Key recommendations for replication include infrastructure planning, robust patient and data selection criteria and prioritising patient consent and privacy. Conclusions: This secure and extensible imaging and HNC RT cancer database setup promises to be an exceedingly useful tool for research, revolutionising the time and cost associated with the production of ML models, making the process safer, faster and more efficient.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedatadatabasegovernanceinfrastructure

Identifiers

PMID41646219
PMCPMC12836594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.