Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646217›Full record

ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2025

Association between neoadjuvant paclitaxel dose intensity and outcomes in early triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer: a real-world data analysis.

C van Marcke, K Pogoda, H Fenton, M Vallet, G Plavc, M Borges, H Yousuf, E Dumas, M Berliere, G Ciliberto and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

C van MarckeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
K PogodaDepartment of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
H FentonLeeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
M ValletEdinburgh Cancer Informatics, University of Edinburgh/NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
G PlavcDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
M BorgesIQVIA Ltd, London, UK.
H YousufDepartment of Medical Oncology, St James University Hospital, Leeds, England.
E DumasResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
M BerliereDepartment of Gynaecology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
G CilibertoMedical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
F P DuhouxDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
V FanoEpidemiology and Tumor Registry Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
P HallEdinburgh Cancer Informatics, University of Edinburgh/NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
K Kolenc MokotarThe Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
L Lopes ConceicaoEpidemiology, Outcomes, Economics and Management in Oncology Group - Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO-Porto) - Porto, Portugal.
F PereiraMedical Oncology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO-Porto) - Porto, Portugal.
A ŠkoporcDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
A ThomasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
G TramontiEdinburgh Cancer Informatics, University of Edinburgh/NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
M R van BockstalDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
P ViciPhase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
M UherMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
E KrasniqiPhase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reduction of paclitaxel dose intensity (PDI) is frequent during neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk early triple-negative (TN) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC), due to toxicity. The association between PDI and cancer outcomes is uncertain. Patients and methods: We collected across eight European cancer centers (DigiCore consortium) a cohort of early TN and HER2-positive BC patients who received neoadjuvant anthracyclines and weekly paclitaxel. For each subtype, we assessed whether a threshold of reduced PDI (through dose reduction, treatment delay or early cessation) was associated with reduced pathological complete response (pCR) rate. We then described the association between reduced PDI, invasive BC-free survival (IBCFS), and overall survival. Results: We included 514 TNBC and 249 HER2-positive BC patients. PDI reductions were required in 82.9% and 63.9% of patients, respectively. The optimal cut-off separating high and low PDI was 69% and 72%, respectively. Low PDI was in TNBC (29.8% of patients), but not in HER2-positive BC (22.1% of patients), significantly associated with a reduced pCR rate, compared with high PDI (37.3% versus 55.1%) (odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.71, Conclusions: Reduction of PDI is frequently required during neoadjuvant treatment in early TNBC and HER2-positive BC, and is associated with lower pCR rate and IBCFS in TNBC. Reduction of PDI needs careful consideration, balancing adverse events and potential impact. Confirmation in independent datasets is warranted.

Indexed as

breast cancerdose intensityneoadjuvantpaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID41646217
PMCPMC12836558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.