Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646212›Full record

ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2025

Opportunities and challenges in pooling health-related quality-of-life data for prediction modeling in breast cancer across Europe: lessons from the EORTC BALANCE project.

T G W van der Heijden, N J Hubel, K M de Ligt, I R Kist, V Arndt, H M Verkooijen, G Velikova, M Hoedjes, B H de Rooij, B Holzner and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

T G W van der HeijdenDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N J HubelUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
K M de LigtDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I R KistDepartment of Board of Directors, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
V ArndtUnit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
H M VerkooijenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G VelikovaLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
M HoedjesCenter of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
B H de RooijCenter of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
B HolznerUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
L V van de Poll-FranseDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
EORTC QLG

Funding

EORTC HEADQUARTERSU10CA011488 · NCI · EUROPEAN ORG/RES/TREATMENT/CANCER · PI LACOMBE, DENIS · 1985 to 2015
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA011488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a crucial outcome for cancer patients, providing a comprehensive measure of patient well-being beyond traditional clinical endpoints. While HRQoL data are increasingly available from real-world data (RWD), randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies, they remain fragmented, limiting their utility for large-scale analysis. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group's BALANCE project aims to address this by pooling and harmonizing international HRQoL datasets for breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: This article describes the challenges of pooling international HRQoL datasets, including the process of dataset identification, acquisition, and harmonization within the BALANCE project. Results: We successfully pooled and harmonized six datasets, representing 6500 patients and over 30 000 observations from diverse RCTs, observational studies, and RWD sources. The resulting database includes 142 variables across demographic, clinical, and HRQoL domains. Challenges included various interpretations of the General Data Protection Regulation across Europe, related to data protection and ownership. Furthermore, inconsistent data collection and resource limitations (e.g. funding or personnel) required iterative negotiations and customized harmonization. This led to the exclusion of 17 datasets containing an estimated number of 20 000-22 500 patients. Conclusions: The BALANCE project demonstrates the feasibility of pooling international HRQoL data by overcoming key barriers and creating one of the largest HRQoL datasets for breast cancer. It lays the groundwork for upcoming publications focused on developing and validating prediction models. Future research should focus on adopting standardized data models, including secondary use clauses in consent forms, and establishing RWD registries to facilitate data sharing.

Indexed as

breast cancerdata harmonizationdata poolinghealth-related quality of lifepatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41646212
PMCPMC12836501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.