ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Real-world landscape of drug-related ocular injuries: a retrospective pharmacovigilance study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to detect risk signals of drug-related ocular injuries, delineate their real-world epidemiological features, and provide evidence-based guidance for safe clinical use by utilizing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Adverse event reports classified under "Eye disorders" (System Organ Class, SOC) were extracted from the FAERS database covering Q1 2004 to Q4 2024. Disproportionality analyses were employed to identify drug-ocular injury associations, and the time-to-onset (TTO) of adverse reactions was analyzed using Weibull distribution modeling. Results: A total of 1,242,518 reports from 832,314 patients were included, with females accounting for 60.56% and elderly patients (≥65 years) for 21.63%. Serious outcomes comprised 62.80% of the reports. In total, 2,696 primary suspect drugs were identified, of which 359 met the signal detection criteria. High-risk drug categories included sensory organ drugs (ATC: S class, ROR = 4.93) and antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents (ATC: L class, most reports but ROR = 0.84). The top three drugs by signal strength were brolucizumab (ROR = 132.15), macrogol 400 (ROR = 117.96), and cenegermin (ROR = 60.19). The most common ocular injury types were blurred vision (121,517 cases), visual impairment (113,320 cases), and cataract (51,826 cases). TTO analysis indicated that most drugs exhibited an "early failure type" (β < 1), such as dupilumab (β = 0.68); only two drugs exhibited a random failure type. Conclusion: The risk of drug-related ocular injuries is primarily associated with sensory organ drugs and biologics, with the greatest risk occurring during the early treatment phase. Clinical monitoring should prioritize female and elderly patients, especially regarding ocular symptoms at the onset of drug therapy, to strengthen pharmacovigilance and inform personalized medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.