Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646190›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Machine learning-driven sedation-analgesia optimization in mechanically ventilated sepsis patients: a retrospective MIMIC-IV analysis.

Qinxue Hu, Tao Xu, Xiaolan Gao, Xianying Lei, Lirong Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qinxue HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Tao XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xiaolan GaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xianying LeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Lirong HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the intensive care unit (ICU), septic patients frequently require endotracheal intubation followed by invasive mechanical ventilation. Nonetheless, the optimal sedation-analgesia regimen for these critically ill patients remains undetermined. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV version 3.0) database to examine septic patients who underwent endotracheal intubation and subsequent invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Initially, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to evaluate the prognostic impact of different sedation-analgesia regimens. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was utilized to identify key prognostic factors. Multiple machine learning algorithms were then implemented to develop predictive models, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the model outputs and determine the most influential predictors. Results: Following the initial screening process, seven distinct sedation-analgesia regimens with sample sizes greater than 100 were incorporated into the final analysis. Utilizing Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models, the combination of fentanyl and midazolam was identified as the most advantageous regimen. This association remained statistically significant after adjusting for confounding variables, demonstrating a reduction in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (length of stay in ICU, HR [95% CI]: 0.66 [0.52-0.85]) and a decrease in ICU mortality (OR [95% CI]: 0.62 [0.46-0.85]). Subsequently, LASSO regression analysis identified seven key prognostic factors associated with outcomes in this patient subgroup. Among the machine learning models developed for outcome prediction, the LightGBM model exhibited superior performance (AUC = 0.838). SHAP analysis indicated that the top three predictors of 28-day mortality were the Acute Physiology Score III (APS III), patient age, and the presence of acute renal failure. Conclusion: The concurrent administration of fentanyl and midazolam was associated with lower ICU mortality and shorter length of ICU stay among septic patients necessitating endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation, suggesting potential clinical benefit. Furthermore, the LightGBM algorithm exhibited superior predictive accuracy for ICU mortality within this cohort, suggesting its potential utility as a tool for supporting data-driven clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

lightgbmmechanical ventilationmechine learningsedation-analgesia optimizationsepsisSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID41646190
PMCPMC12868193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.