ArticleSports medicine and health science2026
Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance the hypoalgesic effect of exercise?
Article in Sports medicine and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Healthy Individuals: An fNIRS Study.Brain and behavior · 2025Trial
- Conditioned pain modulation, cortical imbalance, and arthrogenic muscle inhibition: an integrative model with implications for exercise in chronic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exercise produces a decrease in pain sensitivity via an effect called exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), acting on similar analgesic mechanisms as EIH, represents a potential complementary intervention that may amplify the effects of exercise on pain. This study aimed to explore if anodal tDCS could enhance the effect of exercise on pain compared to exercise alone. A total of 35 healthy participants aged 19-37 years completed a familiarisation session followed by two separate sessions where active and sham tDCS was applied in a randomised cross-over design. The familiarisation session involved familiarisation to the pain assessment and exercise tasks, while the subsequent tDCS sessions involved pain sensitivity assessment, exercise and either anodal tDCS or sham tDCS. tDCS doses were applied at 2 mA over the primary motor cortex for 10 min, with the reference electrode placed over the contralateral supraorbital area. The exercise task involved a sustained isometric grip strength contraction at 35% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) until volitional exhaustion. Pain sensitivity was evaluated as pressure pain threshold before tDCS, after tDCS, and after exercise. Across both tDCS conditions, pain threshold was higher after exercise when compared to pre- and post-tDCS measurement. This increase in pain threshold did not differ between active and sham tDCS conditions. Our findings suggest that the hypoalgesic effects of active anodal tDCS over the motor cortex prior to exercise are no greater than the effects of sham tDCS prior to exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.