ArticleIntestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)
Long-term outcomes of patients with kidney and intestine-containing graft co-transplantation.
Article in Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Transplant is the standard of care for patients with kidney or intestine failure. However, in patients with both kidney and intestine failure, it is unclear whether simultaneous or delayed transplant is preferred. This study explores survival and graft-failure outcomes for simultaneous (SK), delayed (DK), and no kidney (NK) transplantation in the setting of simultaneous intestinal and kidney failure. Methods: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was queried between January 1994 and December 2023 for all first-time intestine transplant recipients undergoing preoperative peritoneal or hemodialysis. Patients were grouped by kidney transplant timing. Bivariate analyses were conducted on demographics, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance status, and diabetes status. Censured survival curves were developed for overall survival and intestinal graft failure-free survival. All statistics were conducted on SAS Academic. Results: A total of 54 patients (8 NK, 39 SK, 7 DK) were included. DK patients had both greater overall survival (p = 0.029) and graft failure-free survival (p = 0.020). Adjusted models with survival time measured from time of kidney transplant showed a clinically significant trend for both graft and overall survival for DK patients. Conclusions: Patients with end stage renal disease and intestinal failure may benefit from delayed kidney transplantation. As this is a rare situation with few instances in large databases, further research would be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.