Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646104›Full record

ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024

EBANO study: real-world data from patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) in Northern Spain.

R Fernández Rodríguez, N Sagastibeltza, E Pujol Obis, N Lainez Milagro, R Sánchez-Escribano, M Martínez Kareaga, J A Verdún Aguilar, M Arruti Ibarbia, M Pumares González, T de Portugal Fernández Del Rivero and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

R Fernández RodríguezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Cruces & Instituto Oncológico IMQ Bilbao - Clínica IMQ Zorrotzaurre, Bizkaia.
N SagastibeltzaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-OSI Donostialdea, Donostia.
E Pujol ObisHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza.
N Lainez MilagroHospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona.
R Sánchez-EscribanoHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
M Martínez KareagaHospital Universitario de Araba - Txagorritxu, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
J A Verdún AguilarHospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza & Hospital de Alcañiz, Teruel.
M Arruti IbarbiaHospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Bizkaia.
M Pumares GonzálezHospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos.
T de Portugal Fernández Del RiveroComplejo Asistencial de Zamora, Zamora.
A Lacalle EmborujoHospital San Pedro, Logroño.
I Gil ArnaizHospital Reina Sofia de Tudela, Navarra.
A Pereira-ElorrietaInstituto de investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander.
C Álvarez FernándezHospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo.
I DuranInstituto de investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander.
GONORTE Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited real-world data exist on managing locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), crucial for predicting outcomes and integrating new treatments. This study explores la/mUC in Northern Spain. Methods: Retrospective observational analysis from 16 hospitals across 12 provinces. The study population included adult patients diagnosed with la/mUC (1 January 2007-31 December 2019). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 1230 patients were included, 83% were males, median age was 68, and 70% had a smoking history. The most common primary tumor was bladder (89.2%) followed by renal pelvis (6.4%), ureter (4.3%), and urethra (0.1%) and most of them (91%) were pure urothelial tumors. Cystectomy was the predominant treatment of localized disease (69%) and 30% received perioperative chemotherapy. Twenty-four percent of la/mUC patients never received systemic therapy and out of 934 patients treated with first-line (1L) therapy, 55% were fit for cisplatin. Progression to further lines of treatment was poor, only 53% ( Conclusions: This Spanish real-world data analysis echoes previous findings and highlights unmet needs, including the proportion of patients not receiving systemic treatment and the limited progression to subsequent lines of therapy, hampering access to new effective treatments.

Indexed as

bladder cancerdisease managementimmunotherapyreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID41646104
PMCPMC12836527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.