Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41646101›Full record

ReviewESMO real world data and digital oncology2024

Characteristics and impact of real-world evidence studies in oncology: comprehensive mapping review of publications evaluating targeted therapies in solid tumours.

A Pellat, T Grinda, P Cresta Morgado, A Prelaj, V Miskovic, A Valachis, I Zerdes, D Martins-Branco, L Provenzano, A Spagnoletti and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

A PellatDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Cochin APHP, Paris, France.
T GrindaDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
P Cresta MorgadoProstate Cancer Translational Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
A PrelajMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
V MiskovicMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
A ValachisDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
I ZerdesDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
D Martins-BrancoScientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland.
L ProvenzanoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
A SpagnolettiMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
G Nader-MartaAcademic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
B E WilsonDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Y-H YangNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
G PentheroudakisScientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland.
S DelalogeDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
L Castelo-BrancoMedical Oncology Division, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
M KoopmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A mapping review of real-world evidence (RWE) publications on targeted therapy (TT) for solid tumours was carried out to describe their characteristics, strengths, and limitations. Methods: RWE publications were identified that: (i) focused on TTs in patients with solid tumours; (ii) included study objectives of effectiveness, predictive or prognostic factors, safety or quality of life; (iii) were published between 1 January 2020 and 22 December 2022. Associations between study variables and journal impact factor (IF) were explored through regression and cluster network analyses. Results: Of 7775 publications identified, 1251 were eligible for analysis. The number of publications per year increased over time. Most studies were conducted in Asia (50%), Europe (25%), and North America (17%), with only 8% in more than one country. Data sources were mostly health records (55%) and registries (11%). Most studies were retrospective (85%) and only 16% were population based. Gastrointestinal tumours were the most frequently studied (30%), followed by lung (22%) and breast (21%). The median journal IF was 4.4. Involvement of >10 centres and studies originating from Europe were significantly associated with a higher IF (≥7) in multivariable analysis. Network analysis demonstrated strong associations between countries and the number of publications in specific tumour types. Conclusions: The number of RWE publications on TT for solid tumours is increasing, but studies are heterogeneous, mostly retrospective, and published in low IF journals. International collaboration and promotion of standardised data sources is imperative to enhance the relevance of RWE research to complement clinical guidelines and impact clinical practice.

Indexed as

mapping reviewnetwork analysisoncologyreal-world evidencesolid tumourstargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID41646101
PMCPMC12836563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.