ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2023
Endoscopic management of colorectal anastomosis refractory leaks: a journey from conventional to inventive approaches.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Postsurgical leaks are a dreaded adverse event of colorectal surgery. Traditional surgical approaches, including temporary ileostomy and revisional surgery, are the preferred methods for managing these challenging leaks. However, with the development of less-invasive techniques associated with lower morbidity, the combined use of temporary ileostomy and endoscopic therapies is on the rise. Although surgical management and endoscopic traditional therapies are often successful, alternative approaches are necessary when both approaches fail. Methods: This is the first case report of a patient with a chronic colorectal anastomotic leak with an associated contained collection successfully treated with magnetic anastomosis to provide internal drainage. Results: A 60-year-old man who underwent surgical treatment of a rectal adenocarcinoma presented with a dehiscence of the suture line with an associated contained collection. He underwent 2 surgical revisions and several conventional endoscopic therapies to treat this adverse event with no successful closure. Thus, endoscopic internal drainage with magnetic anastomosis followed by septotomy and endoscopic vacuum therapy for 1 week were successfully performed. At the 6-month follow-up, rectoscopy showed a normal rectal/colonic tubular shape without any signs of transmural defects and stenosis. Conclusions: Endoscopic internal drainage is a safe and effective strategy for managing leaks associated with contained collections. After conventional techniques fail, the use of magnets for internal drainage by an anastomosis between the collection and the lumen appears to be an attractive option. This approach has the potential to enhance patient outcomes, improve quality of life, and reduce morbidity. Further research is required to validate our findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.