Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41645964›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026

Polarising SNPs Without Outgroup.

Jinyang Liang, Julien Y Dutheil

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polarising SNPs Without Outgroup.Molecular ecology resources · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinyang LiangDepartment of Theoretical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4015-6228
Julien Y DutheilDepartment of Theoretical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-4121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asserting which allele is ancestral or derived, known as polarisation, is a prerequisite of many population and quantitative genetic methods. One important application is the inference of the unfolded site-frequency spectrum (uSFS). The most widely used approaches are based on outgroup data. However, for studies on species with only distantly related outgroups, large divergence between the ingroup and outgroup can result in alignment difficulties and substantial missing data, causing many sites of interest to be lost. Here, we present PolarBEAR (Polarisation By Estimation of the Ancestral Recombination graph), a method that uses the local genealogies from the ancestral recombination graph (ARG) to infer ancestral states. We show that PolarBEAR reaches high accuracy in polarisation and uSFS estimation using simulations under several scenarios. This accuracy, however, heavily depends on the ARG reconstruction method employed. We also applied our method to human population data and compared it with the outgroup-based method est-sfs. Although PolarBEAR could not infer the ancestral state with high confidence at certain positions, it obtained results for positions that est-sfs could not polarise due to missing outgroup data. The polarisation results of the two methods were highly consistent at positions inferred by both methods. The two methods inferred similar uSFS, with PolarBEAR estimating slightly fewer high-frequency derived alleles. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PolarBEAR is robust across different mutation models in our simulations, while est-sfs exhibits a bias in the presence of heterogeneous base composition. PolarBEAR can complement outgroup-based methods, or replace them when no appropriate outgroup sequence is available.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenetics, PopulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularHumansRecombination, Geneticancestral recombination graphoutgrouppolarisationunfolded site‐frequency spectrum

Identifiers

PMID41645964
PMCPMC12878804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.