Trial reportJournal of hospital medicine2026
A randomized trial of I-SLEEP: A patient education and empowerment intervention on inpatient sleep duration and medical sleep disruptions.
Trial report in Journal of hospital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04151251 (Mentoring Patient-Oriented Research), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mentoring Patient-Oriented Research: Sleep & Health During & After Hospital Stay
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSleep is essential for recovery in hospitalized patients, yet frequent disruptions from medical care make rest difficult. Most prior efforts have focused on environmental modifications, often overlooking patients' role in advocating for their sleep.
objectivesThis study evaluated the effectiveness of the Inpatient Sleep Loss: Educating and Empowering Patients (I-SLEEP) intervention in improving sleep duration and reducing medical care disruptions among hospitalized patients.
methodsIn this single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT04151251), general medicine patients at the University of Chicago were randomized to either I-SLEEP (sleep education, advocacy questions, and a sleep kit) or standard care (sleep kit alone) between July 2019 and March 2023. The primary outcome was patient-reported sleep duration. Secondary outcomes included actigraphy-measured sleep duration and continuity (efficiency and wake after sleep onset), as well as patient-reported sleep disruptions. Mixed effects models adjusted for covariates were used for analysis.
resultsA total of 194 participants were enrolled. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between groups. Sleep duration and continuity did not differ significantly between groups. However, patients receiving I-SLEEP reported fewer disruptions from vital sign monitoring (63% vs. 75%, p = .004), medication administration (49% vs. 61%, p = .003), and laboratory draws (57% vs. 68%, p = .009). These findings remained significant after adjusting for covariates.
conclusionsI-SLEEP did not increase sleep duration or continuity but reduced medical care disruptions. These findings suggest that patient education and empowerment may be effective strategies for reducing preventable care-related sleep disruptions in hospitals. Further research should examine implementation at scale and potential long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.