Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2026
Efficacy and Safety of Ritlecitinib in the Asian Subpopulation of the ALLEGRO-2b/3 and ALLEGRO-LT Clinical Studies for Alopecia Areata.
Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04006457 (A PHASE 3 OPEN-LABEL, MULTI-CENTER, LONG-TERM STUDY INVESTIGATING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-06651600 IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT PARTICIPANTS WITH ALOPECIA AREATA), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A phase 3 open-label, multi-center, long-term study investigating the safety and efficacy of pf-06651600 in adult and adolescent participants with alopecia areata
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ritlecitinib is an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor approved for individuals aged ≥ 12 years with severe alopecia areata. Here we report interim efficacy and safety results with ritlecitinib up to Month 24 in the Asian subpopulation from the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 and ALLEGRO-LT studies. Data are reported for participants with Severity of Alopecia Tool score ≥ 50 who received ritlecitinib 50 mg with (200/50-mg group) or without (50-mg group) an initial 4-week 200-mg daily loading dose in ALLEGRO-2b/3, and continued ritlecitinib 50 mg in ALLEGRO-LT. In long-term studies, it is common for summaries at later time points to reflect participants who remained in the study, tolerated the drug, and had a positive treatment response. To account for this, efficacy summaries were presented both as observed and by using the last observation carried forward method. At Month 12, 51.7% and 44.7% (last observation carried forward) of Asian participants in the 50-mg (n = 58) and 200/50-mg groups (n = 47), respectively, achieved Severity of Alopecia Tool score ≤ 20 (≤ 20% scalp hair loss); the respective proportions were 50.0% and 47.8% at Month 24. Of participants who achieved Severity of Alopecia Tool score ≤ 20 at Month 12 in the 50-mg and 200/50-mg groups, 68.2% and 86.7% sustained this response through Month 24, respectively. At Month 12, 74.0% and 57.9% of participants in the 50-mg and 200/50-mg groups, respectively, had an eyebrow hair regrowth response; at Month 24, the proportions were 72.0% and 48.7%. At Month 12, 65.1% and 54.1% of participants in the 50-mg and 200/50-mg groups, respectively, had an eyelash hair regrowth response; the proportions were 65.1% and 52.8% at Month 24. The proportion of participants with a Patients' Global Impression of Change response of "moderately" or "greatly" improved since baseline increased through Month 24 in both groups. Ritlecitinib had an acceptable safety profile, consistent with that in the overall population. Overall, ritlecitinib 50 mg (±200-mg loading dose) demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained efficacy through Month 24 in the Asian subpopulation, consistent with results in the overall population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04006457.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.