Trial reportClinical and translational science2026
A First-In-Human Randomized Controlled Phase 1 Study Assessing the Safety and Tolerability of Topical TCP-25 Gel in Epidermal Suction Blister Wounds.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05378997 (A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Ascending Topical Doses of TCP-25 Applied to Epidermal Suction Blister Wounds and in Patients With Non-Healing Leg Ulcers and Patients With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Ascending Topical Doses of TCP-25 Applied to Epidermal Suction Blister Wounds and in Patients With Non-Healing Leg Ulcers and Patients With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A First-In-Human Randomized Controlled Phase 1 Study Assessing the Safety and Tolerability of Topical TCP-25 Gel in Epidermal Suction Blister Wounds.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammation and infection remain unmet challenges in wounds of various etiologies, delaying healing, impacting quality of life, and increasing healthcare costs. The thrombin-derived C-terminal peptide TCP-25 has demonstrated dual anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activities in animal wound infection models, thereby promoting healing, highlighting its therapeutic potential as a wound treatment. This first-in-human, double-blind, randomized, within-person and placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT05378997) evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of topical TCP-25 in healthy volunteers. Twenty-four participants each received four suction blister wounds (two per thigh), with two wounds treated with TCP-25 (either 0.86, 2.9, or 8.6 mg/mL) and two with placebo gel, 5 times over 8 days. For the primary safety endpoint, no serious or significant adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events were reported. Twenty-one participants (88%) reported at least 1 adverse event; all were mild or moderate and judged to be unlikely related to TCP-25 treatment. No abnormal local reactions occurred and no clinically relevant changes in electrocardiogram, vital signs, laboratory parameters, or physical examination findings were observed between baseline and end of treatment. For the secondary endpoint, TCP-25 was undetectable (< 90 nmol/L) in all plasma samples at all timepoints. Thus, topical TCP-25 gel was safe and well tolerated by healthy volunteers with epidermal wounds, with no evidence of measurable systemic exposure. Exploratory analyses indicated reduced wound exudation with TCP-25 treatment, particularly at 2.9 and 8.6 mg/mL. Taken together, these findings support further clinical evaluation of TCP-25 in relevant patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.