ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
The effect of drought stress on the limits and costs of plasticity in floral longevity in response to pollinator decline.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseDeclines in pollinator populations can reduce pollination services to plants, resulting in lower seed production. In response to these reductions, plants could increase the probability of pollinator visitation by plastically extending floral longevity. However, whether extended floral longevity increases seed production as pollinators decline depends on the limits to and costs of plasticity in longevity, both of which could be affected by drought stress.
methodsTo test whether drought stress affects the limits to and costs of plasticity in floral longevity in response to pollinator decline, we exposed Lobelia siphilitica to droughted and well-watered treatments and measured floral longevity and the number of seeds produced by flowers pollinated on day 1 vs. day 5 of the female phase. If floral longevity is shorter in the droughted treatment, then drought stress could limit the expression of extended longevity. If delaying pollination until day 5 reduces seed production more in the droughted treatment, then drought stress could increase the cost of extended longevity.
resultsThe droughted treatment reduced floral longevity by ~18% but did not affect the number of seeds produced by flowers pollinated on day 1 vs. day 5. Instead, delaying pollination until day 5 reduced the number of seeds by ~24% in both the droughted and well-watered treatments.
conclusionsDrought stress does not affect the cost of plasticity in floral longevity but could limit the expression of extended longevity. Consequently, whether extended floral longevity could increase seed production as pollinators decline may depend on human-induced changes in precipitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.