ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2026
Cell-free DNA from cerebrospinal fluid cytology specimens as a novel liquid biopsy approach for pediatric patients with primary central nervous system tumors.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy in Primary CNS Tumors: Bridging Biology, Technology, and Clinical Care.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Molecular Diagnosis, Disease Monitoring, and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssessing circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been proposed as a promising alternative to tissue biopsy. Advances in cfDNA sequencing have further underscored the potential of CSF liquid biopsies in the clinical setting. CSF is routinely collected for cytologic evaluation at diagnosis and at recurrence in both pediatric and adult central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Preliminary studies have shown that CSF cfDNA analysis may be more sensitive than CSF cytology for detecting the presence of tumor.
methodsCSF specimens were prospectively collected from seven pediatric patients with primary CNS malignant tumors. When possible, CSF was collected fresh and from processed cytology specimens. Low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a custom targeted sequencing panel were performed on the specimens to identify copy number alterations (CNAs), detect mutations, and estimate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fractions. Results were compared with matched tumor tissue molecular profiles and corresponding imaging findings.
resultsAbnormalities in cfDNA were detected in four patients. Sequencing of CSF cytology supernatants demonstrated the presence of circulating tumor DNA with characteristic CNAs and mutations that matched what was seen the tumor tissue as well as the fresh CSF specimens. These studies also revealed tumor heterogeneity and genomic evolution over time.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing routinely discarded supernatants from CSF cytology specimens for LP-WGS and targeted NGS. Our approach optimizes the use of CSF that may be limited in pediatric patients as a source for liquid biopsy-based genomic studies. Future research will be necessary to optimize and validate the methodology to enable clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.