Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41645355›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2026

Macroepidemiologic assessment of swine disease co-occurrences in the United States of America.

Guilherme A Cezar, Eric R Burrough, Rodger G Main, Melanie Prarat Koscielny, Ryan Farmer, Ryan Yanez, Rafael R Nicolino, Daniel C L Linhares, Giovani Trevisan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guilherme A CezarDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Eric R BurroughDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Rodger G MainDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Melanie Prarat KoscielnyOhio Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, USA.
Ryan FarmerOhio Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, USA.
Ryan YanezOhio Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, USA.
Rafael R NicolinoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Daniel C L LinharesDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Giovani TrevisanDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. trevisan@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-526X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swine producers frequently encounter polymicrobial disease challenges, with co-infections exacerbating clinical disease and complicating response strategies. This study aimed to characterize co-diagnosis patterns in swine by integrating confirmed diagnosis cases using a standardize diagnosis system (Dx code) from the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory. As a secondary objective, the study developed the concept and implemented a framework for the technological transfer of the Dx code system from ISU-VDL to the Ohio Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, and to gather Dx code data through an animal disease monitoring program, thereby creating a multi-institutional, confirmed tissue disease diagnosis database. The final collated database was harmonized and used to analyze 45,310 confirmed tissue diagnosis cases submitted between 2020 and 2025. Co-diagnosis was defined as the presence of two or more distinct etiologies within a single case. Overall, 52.62% of cases were co-diagnosed in 42 U.S. states, with a seasonal variation indicating reduced submissions and co-diagnosis rates during the summer months. The wean-to-market production phase accounted for 86.45% of co-diagnosed cases. The co-diagnosed cases were more abundant in respiratory and systemic anatomic systems, with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and Streptococcus suis being the predominant co-diagnosed pathogens. Age-specific trends revealed respiratory co-diagnoses peaking in nursery and grow-finish pigs, while digestive co-diagnoses were more common in suckling piglets. Statistical modeling using Conway-Maxwell-Poisson regression revealed that co-diagnosis cases involving bacterial and viral insults had significantly higher numbers of distinct etiologies (IRR = 2.48; CI: 1.66-3.66) compared with co-diagnosis cases without bacterial or viral involvement, with an expected count of 2.95 distinct etiologies per case. The study demonstrated the value of standardized diagnostic coding for epidemiological surveillance and highlights the complexity of co-infections in swine. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of collaborative data sharing in enhancing swine health management strategies.

Indexed as

BacterialCo-infectionsEtiologyPathogensPorcineViral

Identifiers

PMID41645355
PMCPMC13088664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.