ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Contextual adaptation, implementation, and outcomes of individual placement and support: a case study.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImplementing the evidence-based Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model in welfare states like Sweden faces contextual challenges that often necessitate local adaptations to enhance fit and effectiveness. While fidelity assessments aim to ensure effective outcomes, adaptations may lead to unintended drift from core components. The Model for Adaptation Design and Impact (MADI) help analyse the characteristics of adaptations and their ripple effects. This study explores the interplay between implementation, adaptations and fidelity in mental health services using the MADI framework.
methodsAn embedded case study design was used, involving five mental health services in a major Swedish city. Data from 26 key informants, field notes, and meeting protocols were analysed using content analysis and interpreted through the MADI framework.
resultsThe adaptations were both planned and unplanned, some adaptations supported the integration of IPS and others negatively impacted core components, revealing unintended impacts on implementation and intervention outcomes.
conclusionsTo understand adaptations and its pathways when implementing IPS in mental health services, and other stakeholders, the MADI framework is valuable. Excessive adaptations can compromise core values and fidelity assessments must account for adaptations and their consequences. To ensure IPS remains effective, some practices within mental health services and other organisations may need to be revised or adapt to the method itself to support IPS implementation and outcomes. The findings offer valuable insights for professionals and user organisations adopting evidence-based practices in mental health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.