SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2026
Evidence Suggests Prophylactic Antibiotics May Be Unnecessary in Anorectal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmid increasing global concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance, the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in anorectal surgery has been questioned. In practice, prescribing practices vary widely among surgeons, highlighting the need for stronger evidence-based guidance. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic, critical assessment of the current literature to determine the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective anorectal surgery.
methodsA comprehensive search of studies published between January 1980 and June 2025 was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI); secondary outcomes included systemic infection, wound dehiscence, abscess formation, bleeding, and recurrence. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
resultsNine studies including 2317 participants were included, and five were eligible for meta-analysis. Overall, prophylactic antibiotics were not associated with a significant reduction in postoperative infectious or wound-related complications in RCTs (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.43-1.33, and p = 0.66, moderate GRADE certainty of evidence) or observational studies (RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.01-48.4) and p = 0.53, very low certainty). All studies concluded that routine antibiotic prophylaxis may be unnecessary in anorectal surgery.
conclusionCurrent evidence does not support the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in uncomplicated anorectal procedures. However, the certainty of evidence is limited by small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and limited number of available studies. Large-scale randomized trials are required to strengthen this evidence base.
trial registrationThe review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database CRD420251159850.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.