ArticleBMC psychology2026
Embodied learning in the digital age: assessing the impact of gesture-based educational technology on working memory capacity, spatial reasoning, and engagement.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embodied cognition theory underscores the close coupling of bodily action and cognition, suggesting that learning can be strengthened when language is enacted. However, in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education, the instructional value of gesture-based digital interfaces remains underexamined beyond vocabulary outcomes, particularly in relation to working memory capacity, spatial reasoning, and learner engagement. Addressing this gap, the present study examined how gesture-mediated interactions shape cognitive and affective outcomes in an EFL context using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. A total of 143 Grade 12 students participated in the study, with 74 were allocated to the experimental group (EG) and 69 to the control group (CG). Over a period of six weeks, EG participated in language tasks using Leap Motion, while CG received traditional instruction. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, we administered three validated scales pre/post and collected open-ended responses from the experimental group; findings were integrated to interpret convergent quantitative and qualitative patterns. Working memory capacity, spatial reasoning, and engagement were measured using validated scales The quantitative analyses indicated that EG made significantly larger improvements in working memory capacity, spatial reasoning, and engagement compared to CG. Qualitative narratives supported these findings, highlighting increased motivation, deeper understanding, and greater agency among participants in EG, despite some initial technical challenges. These results approve that gesture-based instruction may offer a promising approach for enhancing EFL instruction, boosting cognitive abilities and strengthening classroom engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.