ArticleClinical epigenetics2026
Multi-tissue DNA methylation analysis to identify an appropriate surrogate tissue for a unique neurological tissue specific to spina bifida.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnimal models suggest a role of epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, in neural tube closure; however, studies characterizing DNA methylation profiles in nervous system tissue from humans with spina bifida are limited. In this study, we assessed DNA methylation profiles in dural tissue of infants with spina bifida, collected at the time of surgical closure of the defect, and examined whether whole blood or buccal swab are appropriate surrogate tissues, as they are more practical to collect in large-scale epidemiological studies. DNA methylation was measured in dural tissue, buccal swab, and whole blood samples collected from 27 unique infants using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array.
resultsCorrelation analysis for each CpG site comparing DNA methylation from all participants in dural tissue to DNA methylation in whole blood DNA or buccal swab DNA yielded 1555 statistically significant associations for the whole blood analysis and 920 significant associations for the buccal swab analysis at the Bonferroni threshold of significance. We also performed paired analysis, calculating differences between tissues within each individual and then averaging differences across individuals. After accounting for multiple hypothesis testing using the FDR adjustment, 33% of CpG sites assessed were not significantly differentially methylated between dural tissue and whole blood samples, compared to the 27% of sites not differentially methylated between dural tissue and buccal swab samples.
conclusionsThese results suggest that in the absence of dural tissue, both whole blood and buccal swab samples may be considered as surrogates for dural tissue. The study warrants replication in larger groups to validate findings and may assist researchers restricted to more accessible biospecimens (i.e., blood) to further characterize epigenetic contributors to neural tube defect etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.