ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2026
The genome of Phlebotomus chinensis, the primary vector of visceral leishmaniasis in China: insights from chromosome-level assembly and comparative analysis.
Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: The genome of Phlebotomus chinensis, the primary vector of visceral leishmaniasis in China: insights from chromosome-level assembly and comparative analysis.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhlebotomus chinensis is the primary vector of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in China. However, the lack of a high-quality genome assembly for this species has limited research on its biology, vector-pathogen interactions, and evolutionary adaptations. To address this critical gap, the first chromosome-level genome assembly of Ph. chinensis was constructed.
methodsNanopore long-read sequencing served as the primary method, complemented by Illumina short-read sequencing for base-level error correction and Hi-C mapping for chromosomal anchoring and chromosome-level scaffolding. Genome annotation integrated transcriptome data from adult, larvae and pupae, homologous protein predictions from closely related sand fly species, and ab initio gene prediction. Comparative genomic analyses were further performed to explore evolutionary relationships and genomic differences between Ph. chinensis, Ph. papatasi, and Lutzomyia longipalpis.
resultsA total of 127.05 Gb of Nanopore data, 10.57 Gb of Illumina clean data, 52.95 Gb of Hi-C clean data, and 14.95 Gb of RNA-seq data were obtained. The final assembled genome size was 195.21 Mb with a scaffold N50 of 49.30 Mb, and 97.24% of the sequences were successfully anchored to 4 chromosomes. Annotation identified 10,909 protein-coding genes (91.48% of which were functionally annotatable), along with 73 rRNAs, 92 small RNAs, 82 regulatory RNAs, 374 tRNAs, 11,870 simple sequence repeats, 6053 tandem repeats, and 478,622 transposable elements. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Ph. chinensis is phylogenetically closest to Ph. papatasi, with an estimated divergence time of approximately 27.1 million years ago. Gene family evolution was dominated by contraction, with 229 expanded and 575 contracted gene families identified in the Ph. chinensis branch. Additionally, 209 positively selected genes were detected, which are crucial for immune response regulation and metabolic processes related to its vectorial capacity. Furthermore, 95 P450 genes were identified, classified into four subfamilies: CYP2, CYP3, mitochondrial CYP (mito), and CYP4.
conclusionsA high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly of Ph. chinensis is reported here for the first time. This assembly serves as a critical genomic resource to advance research into the vector biology, insecticide resistance mechanisms, and evolutionary history, and lays a solid foundation for the development of precision VL control strategies in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.