ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Constructing the program theory: an implementation science approach to understanding a successful interdisciplinary team-based model of rheumatology care.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTeam-based rheumatology care, with rheumatologists and interdisciplinary health professionals (IHPs) working collaboratively, is a promising solution to improve service capacity and patient outcomes. However, increasing the number of team members does not mean a team successfully improves care quality. We sought to identify the key ingredients of a successful team-based rheumatology model to inform spread and scale of effective team-based rheumatology care.
methodsInformed by implementation science frameworks, we used a case study approach to construct the program theory of a leading example of team-based rheumatology care in Ontario, Canada. We completed semi-structured interviews (patients [n = 15], health professionals [n = 11]), naturalistic observations (n = 3), and document reviews. We conducted framework analysis and iteratively developed an Implementation Research Logic Model, linking determinants of optimal team-based rheumatology care to implementation strategies, mechanisms of action, and outcomes.
resultsDiverse skill sets of team members enabled comprehensive, person-centered care. IHPs assumed expanded responsibilities, engaging in all aspects of rheumatology care, increasing care capacity and timely access. Training and mentorship were essential for IHP skill development to implement expanded responsibilities at the highest professional scope. Continuous evaluation and adaptations of the model were essential to address evolving care needs. Stable funding was critical for initiation and sustainability.
conclusionSuccessful team-based rheumatology care involves a patient-centered, adaptable care model supported by sustainable funding, skilled workforce, strong leadership and continuous evaluation. By identifying key components and understanding how they achieve their impact, we have gained valuable insights to inform implementation, spread, and scale of such models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.