ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Open surgical management of an iatrogenic zone 2 aortic injury following MediPort misplacement: a case report of complex vascular injury.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States, around 5 million venous access procedures are performed annually, with over 200,000 of these involving venous port insertions [1, 2]. Percutaneous catheterization for central venous access is a common procedure, nonetheless, can occasionally cause severe complications, some of which include arterial injuries. In this report, we will discuss a rare case of a 48-year-old female, with a recent diagnosis of Stage III ascending colon cancer who underwent a left hemicolectomy with subsequent MediPort placement (PowerPort™ isp M.R.I.™ Implantable port with 8 Fr. Groshong® Valved Catheter), who exhibited an abnormally wide mediastinum on imaging, suggestive of a misplaced Mediport catheter into the aortic arch. This finding prompted her transfer for specialized treatment to our institution. A chest computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed the catheter perforating the aortic arch at Zone 2 proximal to the origin of the left subclavian artery and extending into the aortic arch lumen. The patient underwent median sternotomy, Mediport removal, aortic arch primary repair, hemothorax evacuation, and chest tube placement. This case highlights the risks of percutaneous venous catheterization, the importance of assistive imaging (Ultrasound, Fluoroscopy, etc.) to aid and confirm adequate placement, especially in large-bore catheters, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of severe complications, such as complex vascular injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.