ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2026
Web application development using multiple regression analysis to predict silicosis risk among stone carvers in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a web-based application that uses multiple regression analysis to predict the risk of silicosis among stone carvers in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
methodsData from 243 stone carvers were used to construct a multiple regression model incorporating key associated variables key associated variables: concentration of respirable silica dust, daily working hours, presence of underlying diseases, and residential proximity to the workplace. Model performance was assessed via R², adjusted R², RMSE, and the significance of associated variables. The model was integrated into a user-friendly web application and deployed for real-time risk assessment among 362 stone carvers. Silicosis risk scores were categorized into five levels to facilitate interpretation and targeted interventions. The Mann‒Whitney U test was applied to compare silicosis risk scores before and after application.
resultsThe regression model explained 66.2% of the variance in silicosis risk scores (adjusted R² = 0.662), with strong predictive accuracy (RMSE = 2.59). All predictor variables were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The web application assigned silicosis risk scores ranging from 12 to 25, with 77.1% of participants classified as “very high risk.” However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the model and web application silicosis risk scores (p = 0.155); nonetheless, the observed trend suggests potential benefits in enhancing worker awareness and promoting protective behaviors.
conclusionsThe developed multiple regression model and web application provide an effective tool for real-time silicosis risk prediction and stratification in stone carving communities. This digital health tool shows promise for early risk detection and prevention of silicosis in workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.