ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Can FEM-based preoperative planning for complex tibial plateau fractures improve surgical skills? A cadaver study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplex tibial plateau fractures continue to pose a significant challenge for surgeons. In recent years, the widespread use of CT imaging has led to new insights leading to novel classifications that facilitate 360° stabilization techniques. Visualization in 3D has improved both fracture reduction and surgical outcomes. This study investigated whether preoperative planning of complex tibial plateau fracture fixation via finite element modeling (FEM) could enhance the fixation performance achieved by experienced surgeons and potentially improve outcomes for less experienced surgeons.
methodsIn twelve left cadaveric fresh-frozen human knees with intact soft tissue reproducible Schatzker type IV fractures with lateral depression were created. The samples were paired on the basis of bone mineral density and then randomly allocated into two groups. Six senior surgeons with extensive experience in the operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures performed two procedures: one using standard preoperative planning and one using FEM-optimized fixation planning. All fractures were stabilized with a medial locking plate and supplemental single screws when needed. The operation time, radiation dose and implant usage were documented. Surgeon mental workload was measured by the NASA task load index. Finally, the samples were biomechanically tested over four quasistatic load ramps from 10 to 200 N, followed by a cyclic sinusoidal load with increasing load level until failure. Failure was defined as either ≥ 5° varus/valgus malalignment or a vertical impression of the condyles ≥ 3 mm. The initial stiffness and load to failure were assessed via a 3D motion tracking system. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student's t-tests.
resultsNo significant differences were observed in terms of operative time or intraoperative radiation exposure. However, the NASA-TLX mental demand test revealed a statistically significant advantage for the FEM-planned group (33 ± 12.4 vs. 49 ± 8.6 (p = 0.043)), indicating a reduced cognitive load. Additionally, the FEM group exhibited superior biomechanical performance, with a higher load to failure of 1050 ± 535 N vs. 442 ± 226 N (p = 0.041).
conclusionThis biomechanical feasibility study demonstrated that FEM-based preoperative planning is feasible and easy to implement for complex tibial plateau fractures. This planning supports specialized surgeons in challenging operations and can improve the stability of osteosynthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.