Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41645263›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026

Comparative efficacy of different nerve block technologies for postoperative pain management in hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis.

Wei Xiao, Jin-Yan Yin, Jian Yin, Jun-Gang Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei Xiao *Department of Orthopedic, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, 830001, China.
Jin-Yan Yin *Department of Orthopedic, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, 830001, China.
Jian YinDepartment of Orthopedic, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, 830001, China.
Jun-Gang SunDepartment of Orthopedic, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, 830001, China. qzjandyjy@foxmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective pain management following hip arthroplasty is critical for patient recovery. As a key component of multimodal analgesia strategies, nerve blocks are widely utilized for postoperative analgesia. However, the comparative efficacy of different nerve block techniques remains unclear. This study employs a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare analgesic outcomes among six commonly used nerve block techniques after hip arthroplasty.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing postoperative pain outcomes among six nerve block techniques-supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (FIB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), quadratus lumborum block (QLB), pericapsular nerve group block (PENG), lumbar plexus block (LPB), and circum-psoas block (CPB)-after hip arthroplasty were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 15, 2024. 15 RCTs involving 1,068 patients were included. Methodological quality and evidence certainty were assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and GRADE framework. A Bayesian NMA with random/fixed-effects models integrated direct and indirect evidence. Interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Outcomes included static/dynamic pain scores at 12 and 24 h, 24-h intravenous morphine consumption, and postoperative adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, and dizziness).Data were analyzed using R 4.4.1 and Stata 15.

results15 RCTs (n = 1068) comparing six nerve block techniques were included. The NMA showed no statistically significant differences in static or dynamic pain scores at 12 or 24 h. For 24-h morphine consumption, CPB was associated with significantly lower use compared to QLB and FIB. Statistically significant differences were found for postoperative adverse effects. SUCRA rankings consistently indicated CPB had the highest probability of being among the most effective options across outcomes, followed by PENG. The overall certainty of evidence was moderate.

conclusionsThis NMA found no significant differences in analgesia among six nerve blocks after hip arthroplasty, but SUCRA rankings suggest CPB may be optimal for analgesia, morphine-sparing and postoperative adverse effects, while PENG may serve as an alternative in selected clinical contexts. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD420251101790).

Indexed as

Analgesic efficacyHip arthroplastyNerve block technologiesNetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41645263
PMCPMC12973832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.