ArticleBMC health services research2026
Assessment of the medical equipment supply chain in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative methods study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfforts to improve health-related supply chains in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) have typically focused on medicines and vaccines, while medical equipment has often been either overlooked or considered incidental. While national guidance exists on the procurement, maintenance, and reporting on medical equipment, the extent to which these norms are implemented in practice is unclear. This study qualitatively assessed the design and operational functioning of the medical equipment system in the DRC, with a focus on information systems, procurement processes, maintenance, and depreciation, and examined how roles and responsibilities shape equipment availability and functionality at health facilities.
methodsA qualitative research design combined a desk review of national policies and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders at health facilities, health zone offices, provincial health departments, the Ministry of Health, and developmental partner organizations in the DRC. Interviews were analyzed using a hybrid approach of content and thematic analysis.
resultsFindings revealed several weaknesses in the medical equipment system in the DRC. Many health facilities, particularly health centers, lacked the minimum required equipment, which adversely affected the quality of services provided. Responsibility for equipment procurement and maintenance was not clearly defined, leading to a lack of accountability and coordination. We identified a disconnect between data availability, resource mobilization, and decision making within the health system. Both equipment procurement and maintenance were governed by unclear and fragmented processes.
conclusionsOverall, the medical equipment system in the DRC is not designed to meet population needs, and in practice the system is not functioning as designed, which contributes to inadequate availability and maintenance of equipment in health facilities. Based on the barriers identified, recommendations include establishing a formal process to keep facilities informed of equipment requests as well as exploring regular planning and budgeting exercises for equipment procurement. The potential benefits of subsidies for equipment purchases, in certain cases, are also highlighted. The findings from this study offer a blueprint for assessing medical equipment systems in low-income countries, highlighting the importance of this often-overlooked component of quality health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.