Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41645215›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Early resident perceptions of clinical readiness in Italy: associations with demographic and educational factors.

Claudia Ebm, R Sarti, P Almagioni, S Brusa, A C Del Pozo, J Hammond, V Vinci, S Oldani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia EbmDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. claudia.ebm@hunimed.eu.
R SartiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
P AlmagioniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
S BrusaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
A C Del PozoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
J HammondHumanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, MI, Italy.
V VinciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
S OldaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition from undergraduate medical education to residency is a critical phase that demands rapid adaptation to clinical responsibilities, institutional cultures, and complex healthcare systems. Despite curricular reforms, many graduates report feeling underprepared, particularly in procedural and systems-based domains. The aim of the study was to evaluate self-perceived clinical readiness among first-year residents and identify educational and demographic factors they believe influenced their transition into postgraduate training.

methodsA retrospective survey was conducted at Humanitas University and affiliated hospitals between 2024 and 2025. Sixty first-year residents across 27 specialties completed a structured survey eight months into residency training, assessing their readiness at the start of residency and at the time of survey completion. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate regression to identify potential influencers of readiness.

resultsResidents reported a significant increase in perceived readiness over the first eight months (mean score: 2.2 to 3.3, p < 0.001). Confidence was highest in non-technical domains (e.g., teamwork, feedback) and lowest in procedural skills. International exchanges were positively associated with initial perceived readiness (β = 0.47, p = 0.046), while prior internships in the same specialty and graduation from state universities were negatively associated (β = − 0.63 and − 0.50, respectively; p < 0.05). Simulation-based training was rated less useful than clinical internships and exchanges.

conclusionReadiness for clinical practice appears to be a dynamic perception that evolves during the early months of residency and is influenced by how trainees interpret their prior educational experiences. These self-reported associations highlight potential areas for further investigation, underscoring the need for studies using longitudinal and performance-based measures.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansItalyMaleRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical readinessGraduate preparednessInternational mobilityMedical education reformResidency transitionSimulation-based learning

Identifiers

PMID41645215
PMCPMC12973821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.