ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2026
Mothers' experiences of support during a structured breastfeeding support programme in antenatal care: a lifeworld hermeneutic study.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStep three of the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding encourages midwives in antenatal care to discuss the importance and management of breastfeeding with expectant and new parents. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding mothers' experiences of individual antenatal breastfeeding education. This study aims to explain and understand the meaning of the research phenomenon: support from midwives and partners during a structured breastfeeding support programme in antenatal care. The lived experiences of this phenomenon are interpreted from the perspectives of expectant mothers (during pregnancy) and new mothers (two months postpartum).
methodsThe analysis employed a lifeworld hermeneutic approach, based on diaries and interviews with 20 mothers conducted during pregnancy and two months after birth. Participants received structured breastfeeding support based on the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding. A purposive sample was recruited in 2021 in Sweden.
resultsThe research phenomenon, support from midwives and partners during a structured breastfeeding support programme in antenatal care, is understood through the following themes: Feeling safe through responsive, individualised dialogue; Grounding confidence through tailored and accessible breastfeeding knowledge; Breastfeeding as an existential anchor for emotional closeness and maternal identity; Co‑creating space for breastfeeding, with partner support as negotiated meaning; Weighing breastfeeding as a lived balance of perceived gains and everyday constraints; Trust as a foundation for perseverance and acceptance; and Feeling left behind when dialogue and continuity are missing. The main interpretation can be understood as being prepared to make independent decisions about breastfeeding.
conclusionsBeing prepared to make independent decisions about breastfeeding extends beyond receiving information and is shaped through responsive, meaningful encounters. Individual dialogue grounded in each mother's lived experiences, needs, and circumstances fostered a sense of safety, reflection, and growing confidence throughout pregnancy and early motherhood. Mothers valued support that recognised their perspectives and strengthened their ownership of breastfeeding decisions, while negotiated partner involvement deepened shared understanding without compromising maternal autonomy. The findings highlight that continuity‑based, individual antenatal breastfeeding education can complement group sessions, enhance maternal satisfaction, and enable midwives to provide more equitable and accessible care for all families.
trial registrationACTRN12623000648628. Date registered 15th June 2023. Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.