ArticleBMC nursing2026
Perceived patient safety competencies among Slovak nursing students: a psychometric analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Safety Competencies, Clinical Learning Environment and Unfinished Care From the Perspective of Nursing Students: A Multinational Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient safety is a global priority and a core component of nursing education. Competence in this area encompasses cognitive, behavioral, and sociocultural skills such as teamwork, communication, risk management, and recognition of adverse events. The Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) is an internationally validated tool designed to measure students’ self-perceived competencies in both classroom and clinical settings. To date, no validation of the H-PEPSS has been reported in Eastern Europe. Therefore, this study aimed to examine factor validity, reliability, and cross-setting measurement equivalence of the Slovak version of the H-PEPSS (H-PEPSSSVK) and to examine nursing students’ perceived patient safety competencies across classroom and clinical learning environments.
methodsThis cross-sectional validation study was conducted between February and December 2024 across all nine Slovak public universities offering nursing programs. A total of 1,017 students completed the H-PEPSSSVK. The data were analyzed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test competing models, multi-group CFA (MG-CFA) to assess measurement invariance across the classroom and clinical settings, and reliability analysis (McDonald’s omega). Related samples nonparametric test was used to compare the scores across the two settings.
resultsThe modified six-factor correlated model showed the best fit (RMSEA = 0.058; CFI ≥ 0.952; SRMR = 0.030), supporting the instrument’s theoretical structure. Strong factor loadings (0.686–0.852) and high inter-factor correlations (r = .686–0.857) together with HTMT values < 0.85 confirmed construct validity. The MG-CFA demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance, validating the instrument’s equivalence across the classroom and clinical settings. Reliability was excellent (ω > 0.70 for all domains; total scale ω = 0.95). Paired comparisons revealed small and significantly higher classroom scores in three domains, highlighting a persistent theory–practice gap.
conclusionsThe H-PEPSSSVK is a valid, reliable, and contextually appropriate tool for assessing Slovak nursing students’ perceived patient safety competencies. Its use can support curriculum evaluation, educational reform, and international benchmarking, thereby contributing to safer patient care in Slovakia and beyond. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.