ArticleBMC public health2026
Sickness absence in the working age population: a retrospective cohort study using primary care health record data.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short Sickness Absenteeism Rate in a Large Tertiary Hospital: The Role of Fitness for Work and Influenza Vaccination.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEconomic inactivity rate in the UK reached 22.2% in 2024, driven largely by increased long-term sickness, and exceeds those reported in comparable high-income countries. Sickness absence remains a major challenge, imposing substantial costs on individuals and society. This study aimed to assess sickness absence rates and associated economic output losses in primary care for working-age adults in England.
methodsThis was a population-based retrospective cohort study using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database. 10 million adults aged 18–65 years was followed from January 2017 to December 2019 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic period) and March 2022 to February 2023 (late pandemic period). Sickness absence was measured using fit notes (“statements of fitness for work”) issued in primary care. We quantified annual fit note rates, identified underlying medical causes, explored associations between fit note provision, patient’s sociodemographic and health-related factors using random-effect negative binomial regression models, and estimated economic losses due to sickness absence.
resultsAge-standardised fit note rates were 23.5 per 100 person-years pre-pandemic and 24.0 per 100 person-years in the late pandemic period. Fit notes were issued more frequently among females, older individuals, black ethnic groups, lower-income groups, those with obesity, smokers, and those with higher levels of comorbidity. Depression and anxiety were the leading medical diagnoses associated with fit note provision. The estimated total annual cost of sickness absence in England was around £13.3 billion (95% CI £13.3 to £13.4 bn) in the pre-pandemic period, and £15.9 bn (95% CI £15.8 to £15.9 bn) in the late pandemic period.
conclusionsFit note provision in primary care and associated costs rose substantially from the pre-pandemic to the late pandemic period. This was primarily associated with poor mental health and varied among different population groups. Towards the end of the pandemic, this represented approximately £16 billion in annual economic losses in England. This underscores the need for targeted policy interventions and further research to mitigate the health and financial burden of sickness absence, particularly for people with poor mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.