Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41645047›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2026

Modulating the Gut Microbiome as a Therapeutic Approach in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for Gut-Brain Interactions and Immune Pathways: A Narrative Review.

Husna Irfan Thalib, Nuha Fatima, Faaleha Heba Fakruddin, Hosna Hamidullah Ali, Sariya Khan, Mohammed Talha Mohammed Zubair, Mable Pereira, Fatma E Sayed Hassan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Husna Irfan ThalibGeneral Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6361-6586
Nuha FatimaGeneral Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3033-9752
Faaleha Heba FakruddinGeneral Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9508-2927
Hosna Hamidullah AliGeneral Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7003-0717
Sariya KhanGeneral Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9809-872X
Mohammed Talha Mohammed ZubairGeneral Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6012-3254
Mable PereiraSchool of Medicine, Lincoln American University, Georgetown, Guyana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6678-7349
Fatma E Sayed HassanMedical Physiology Department, Kasr Alainy, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3985-8931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system characterized by progressive disability. Emerging evidence has implicated gut microbiome dysbiosis, characterized by decreased short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-producing taxa and increased pro-inflammatory species, in disturbed immune signaling, T-helper17/T-regulatory cells imbalance, disturbed tryptophan metabolism, and disrupted integrity of the blood-brain barrier. In this review, we summarize the mechanistic and therapeutic insights from studies that have explored the gut microbiome in MS.

methodWe performed a literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to January 2025; only English-language articles were included, comprising human MS cohorts and preclinical experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models. Of these, approximately 95 human and preclinical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Evidence synthesis was narrative, without meta-analysis. FINDING: There has been a consistent depletion of beneficial genera such as Faecalibacterium and Roseburia, expansion of Akkermansia muciniphila, and reduction in microbial metabolites such as butyrate, propionate, and neuroactive indole derivatives in MS patients across studies. These changes promote intestinal permeability, exaggerated pro-inflammatory cytokine responses, and microglial activation. The therapeutic approach of restoring microbial balance includes therapies such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and dietary interventions. Early trials have shown modest improvements in relapse rates, fatigue, immune profiles, and microbiome composition. Results across randomized studies are heterogeneous, with no significant clinical benefit in several. Pilot trials report modest reductions in relapse rate (RR ≈ 0.85) and fatigue (Cohen's d ≈ 0.3), but several double‑blind RCTs showed no significant benefit (p  >  0.05) in up to 40% of participants, highlighting variable effect sizes.

conclusionInterventions aimed at the microbiome are promising as adjunct approaches to the treatment of MS, acting principally through the restoration of SCFAs, immune modulation, and strengthening of the gut-brain axis. Larger, longer-term randomized trials are required to confirm clinical efficacy, define responder phenotypes, and inform personalized microbiome-based therapies.

Indexed as

Brain-Gut AxisDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMultiple SclerosisAnimalsBrainHumansProbioticsfecal microbiota transplantationgut microbiomemultiple sclerosisneuroinflammationprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID41645047
PMCPMC12876049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.