ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
"The science of teaching": Understanding anatomy demonstrators' pedagogical content knowledge.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- More than words: The value of qualitative research for advancing educational practice.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) refers to educators' understanding of subject matter integrated with teaching approaches that ensure teaching effectively supports learners' needs. Anatomy demonstrators are temporary or sessional early career educators responsible for facilitating the full spectrum of anatomical learning, yet their understanding and application of PCK are poorly understood. Given the educational value of PCK, this study sought to explore demonstrators' understanding of PCK and identify factors influencing their PCK development. The 11 study participants were current and former anatomy demonstrators at an Australian medical school. Data were collected through seven semi-structured group and individual interviews and analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis using PCK components as the conceptual framework. Three themes were developed: (1) PCK Familiarity, (2) PCK in practice, and (3) Factors influencing PCK development. While demonstrators had limited explicit familiarity with the PCK concept, multiple PCK elements were implicit within descriptions of their educational practice, such as how their knowledge of content, students and context influenced their specific approach. Factors influencing demonstrator PCK development included educational experience, peer collaboration, reflective practice, embodying feedback and development time. Despite anatomy demonstrators having limited teaching experience, this study highlights the application of several components of PCK within their teaching practices. However, there is a considerable opportunity to further develop this group's PCK and thereby the support of learners. Key implications for demonstrators' supervisors and mentors include supporting professional development opportunities such as educational fellowships, encouraging and facilitating reflective practice, and including PCK in role performance standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.