ArticleScientific reports2026
The evolution of object detection from CNNs to transformers and multi-modal fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Object detection, a cornerstone of computer vision, aims to localize and classify objects within images. This comprehensive survey reviews modern object detection methods, focusing on two dominant paradigms: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Transformer-based architectures. This work provides a structured comparison of CNN-based and Transformer-based detection paradigms, highlighting their complementary strengths and trade-offs. CNNs demonstrate advantages in local feature extraction and computational efficiency, whereas Transformers excel at capturing global context through self-attention mechanisms. We also analyze multi-modal fusion techniques integrating Red-Green-Blue (RGB), Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), and language embeddings. Benchmark results from representative models include: Real-Time Detection Transformer (RT-DETR) achieves 53.1% mean Average Precision (mAP) at Intersection over Union (IoU) at 0.5 : 0.95, You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8) achieves 50.2% mAP at 0.5:0.95, real-time detectors exceed 100 frames per second (FPS) with competitive accuracy, and specialized infrared methods achieve 92.45% F-measure on NUAA-SIRST dataset. The work introduces a novel taxonomy of multi-modal fusion strategies, documents field-wide and review-specific limitations, and synthesizes recent 2024 to 2025 benchmarks across diverse datasets. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain in handling scale variation, occlusion effects, and domain adaptation. This survey outlines these persistent obstacles and promising research directions, providing a structured reference for researchers and practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.