Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644996›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Robust imputation-based method for eye, hair, and skin colour prediction from low-coverage ancient DNA.

Zoltán Maróti, Emil Nyerki, Tibor Török, Gergely István Varga, Tibor Kalmár

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zoltán MarótiDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Emil NyerkiDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Tibor TörökResearch Centre of Archaeogenetics, Institute of Hungarian Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Gergely István VargaResearch Centre of Archaeogenetics, Institute of Hungarian Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Tibor KalmárDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. kalmar.tibor@med.u-szeged.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of externally visible traits (eye, hair, and skin colours) from DNA can provide valuable information for contemporary and ancient human populations. The validated HIrisPlex-S method is the primary tool in forensics for phenotyping modern samples. The HIrisPlex-S multiplex PCR assay can handle trace DNA from modern samples, but the analysis of degraded, low-coverage ancient DNA (aDNA) presents additional challenges. Genotype imputation has recently proven successful in effectively filling in missing information in aDNA sequences. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we evaluated how key factors, such as genome coverage, minor allele frequency, extent of postmortem damage, and the population origin of the test individual, influence the efficiency of imputing HIrisPlex-S markers and predicting phenotypes. We used high-coverage sequence data from modern individuals and ancient remains for the evaluation. Our results demonstrate that even with genome coverages as low as 0.1–0.5×, the proposed workflow can predict phenotypes from degraded ancient (or forensic) whole genome sequence (WGS) data with good accuracy. To aid the archaeogenetics community, we have developed aHISPlex. This user-friendly, easily deployable imputation-based framework includes the new bioinformatics tools and the pre-made reference data sets required for the whole analysis.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientEye ColorHair ColorSkin PigmentationGene FrequencyGenotypeHairHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID41644996
PMCPMC12923854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.