ArticleScientific reports2026
Genome editing across Dictyostelia species enables comparative functional genetics of social amoebas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene manipulation is essential for understanding biological mechanisms, yet genetic modification in the social amoebas (Dictyostelia) has been largely limited to Dictyostelium discoideum. Here, we aimed to establish a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing system applicable across the phylogenetic breadth of Dictyostelia, spanning Groups 1-4. Using an extrachromosomal CRISPR/Cas9 vector from D. discoideum, we disrupted stlA and pkaC in Polysphondylium violaceum and pkaC in two early-branching species, Heterostelium pallidum and Cavenderia fasciculata. In D. discoideum, co-introduction of donor oligos with the CRISPR vector enabled selection-free knockout generation of pkaC with 28.6% efficiency. In H. pallidum, where genome editing is typically inefficient, co-electroporation of donor oligos with the CRISPR/Cas9 vector followed by 4 days of drug selection increased the frequency of pkaC disruption from 0.9% to 8.3%. These results demonstrated that the D. discoideum CRISPR/Cas9 system can be extended across Dictyostelia, providing a versatile platform for comparative genetic and evolutionary developmental studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.