ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Dissociable impacts of perceived race and ascribed status in event-related brain potentials and multivariate network activity.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans rapidly and efficiently categorize others with limited information, forming split-second impressions. Prior EEG person perception research has often focused on social categories derived from perceptual cues. However, impressions are frequently based on knowledge of someone. Little research has examined how person knowledge (or the interaction between perceptual category cues and person knowledge) influences the temporal unfolding of person perception, thereby missing a common experience of everyday encounters in which individuals have access to both. Using EEG, this study (n = 29) examined evoked event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and functional neural network responses previously associated with changes in attention and evaluation when perceivers categorized faces based on perceived race (i.e., Black or White) or ascribed socioeconomic status (i.e., high or low). Our findings indicate dissociations between ERPs and functional network dynamics during impression formation. Specifically, in immediate response to a face, perceived race shaped ERPs often associated with attention (P200) and motivation/evaluation (P300). However, ascribed status influenced coordination of the neural networks underlying attention/executive functions and social cognition/evaluation throughout the categorization task, suggesting that participants attended to and evaluated status in a sustained manner. Therefore, while race perception influenced ERPs, status did not. This was the opposite for the network analyses. These findings indicate that perceptual information (perceived race) and person knowledge (ascribed status) can influence impression formation in distinct ways: one in an immediate, evoked manner, and the other through the sustained coordination of functional networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.