ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Celiac Axis Stenosis in Pancreatoduodenectomy: Preoperative Predictors for Intervention Considering Stenosis Severity and Collateral Pathway Development.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial Comment: When the Ligament Matters: Recognition, Intervention, and the Limits of Current Evidence for Median Arcuate Ligament Compression Management in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Updates on Imaging Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer for Determining Anatomic and Biologic Resectability.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy with Arterial Reconstruction and Right Gastric Vessel Preservation for Pancreatic Head Cancer with Atherosclerotic Celiac Axis Stenosis and Common Hepatic Artery Occlusion: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCeliac axis stenosis (CAS) is a significant vascular condition in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy due to division of the celiac circulation during the procedure. However, the reliable conditions for when to intervene remain undefined.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1,042 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. The stenosis diameter and maximum diameter of the celiac axis were measured on preoperative multidetector CT to calculate the stenosis rate (SR). In the patients with CAS (SR ≥ 50%), two additional CT-based markers of arcade development were quantified: 1) the gastroduodenal-to-common hepatic artery diameter (GDA/CHA) ratio and 2) the diameter of the collateral artery connecting the GDA and inferior pancreatoduodenal artery. Four factors (stenosis diameter ≤2 mm, SR ≥70%, GDA/CHA ratio ≥1.0, collateral artery diameter ≥3 mm) were assessed as predictors of intraoperative intervention.
resultsEighty-five patients (8.2%) had CAS (SR ≥50%), of which only 11 (1.1% of the entire cohort) required intervention: median arcuate ligament division (n = 4), arterial reconstruction (n = 5), or collateral preservation (n = 2). Each of the four factors (stenosis diameter ≤2 mm, SR ≥70%, GDA/CHA ratio ≥1.0, collateral artery diameter ≥3 mm) was associated with the need for intervention. Intervention for CAS was not required in any case in which none of the four factors were present. In contrast, all patients with three or more positive factors required intervention.
conclusionsThe four factors (stenosis diameter, SR, GDA/CHA ratio, and collateral artery diameter) may serve as important predictors of CAS intervention. Incorporating these factors into preoperative planning enables surgeons to prepare necessary resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41644922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.