Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644922›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Celiac Axis Stenosis in Pancreatoduodenectomy: Preoperative Predictors for Intervention Considering Stenosis Severity and Collateral Pathway Development.

Yuya Miura, Ryo Ashida, Katsuhisa Ohgi, Yoshiyasu Kato, Shimpei Otsuka, Hideyuki Dei, Rui Sato, Katsuhiko Uesaka, Teiichi Sugiura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuya MiuraDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ryo AshidaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan. r.ashida@scchr.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8388-0135
Katsuhisa OhgiDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yoshiyasu KatoDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shimpei OtsukaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hideyuki DeiDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Rui SatoDivision of Interventional Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Katsuhiko UesakaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Teiichi SugiuraDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCeliac axis stenosis (CAS) is a significant vascular condition in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy due to division of the celiac circulation during the procedure. However, the reliable conditions for when to intervene remain undefined.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1,042 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. The stenosis diameter and maximum diameter of the celiac axis were measured on preoperative multidetector CT to calculate the stenosis rate (SR). In the patients with CAS (SR ≥ 50%), two additional CT-based markers of arcade development were quantified: 1) the gastroduodenal-to-common hepatic artery diameter (GDA/CHA) ratio and 2) the diameter of the collateral artery connecting the GDA and inferior pancreatoduodenal artery. Four factors (stenosis diameter ≤2 mm, SR ≥70%, GDA/CHA ratio ≥1.0, collateral artery diameter ≥3 mm) were assessed as predictors of intraoperative intervention.

resultsEighty-five patients (8.2%) had CAS (SR ≥50%), of which only 11 (1.1% of the entire cohort) required intervention: median arcuate ligament division (n = 4), arterial reconstruction (n = 5), or collateral preservation (n = 2). Each of the four factors (stenosis diameter ≤2 mm, SR ≥70%, GDA/CHA ratio ≥1.0, collateral artery diameter ≥3 mm) was associated with the need for intervention. Intervention for CAS was not required in any case in which none of the four factors were present. In contrast, all patients with three or more positive factors required intervention.

conclusionsThe four factors (stenosis diameter, SR, GDA/CHA ratio, and collateral artery diameter) may serve as important predictors of CAS intervention. Incorporating these factors into preoperative planning enables surgeons to prepare necessary resources.

Indexed as

Celiac ArteryCollateral CirculationPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyNeoplasm StagingPreoperative CarePrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41644922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.