ReviewAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2026
Redrawing the gut map: evolving probiotic approaches to microbiota modulation in inflammatory bowel disease.
Review in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined ProbioticMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
- Therapeutic potential of ginseng and its bioactive compounds in inflammatory bowel disease: current evidence and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) that occurs due to several factors, including, but not limited to, gut microbiota dysbiosis, immune dysregulation, and environmental factors. Despite significant advances in IBD pharmacotherapy, patients often experience treatment failures due to suboptimal treatment responses, frequent relapses, and are also susceptible to developing several adverse effects (AEs), highlighting the need for developing alternative therapies. A growing body of evidence necessitates the importance of maintaining gut microbiome homeostasis, which is commonly disrupted in IBD. Probiotics have emerged as promising adjunctive IBD therapies due to their capacity to modulate immune responses, restore gut microbial balance, and preserve mucosal barrier integrity. Multiple probiotic strains, including Escherichia coli (E. coli) Nissle 1917, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum), Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii (S. boulardii), and combination formulations, such as VSL#3 (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus thermophilus), have demonstrated superior efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in comparison with placebo and comparable efficacy with conventional treatments, such as mesalazine. While the efficacy of probiotics has been demonstrated in UC through several clinical studies, evidence supporting their use in CD remains inconsistent, with studies yielding mixed or inconclusive results. This highlights the necessity for additional carefully designed, large-scale studies specifically targeting CD patients to better understand the therapeutic potential of probiotics in a broader context. Finally, emerging innovations in genetic engineering and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/ CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology offer exciting prospects for the development of precision probiotics, which could possess both diagnostic and treatment benefits and further expand the clinical utility of probiotics in IBD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41644858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.