Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644858›Full record

ReviewAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2026

Redrawing the gut map: evolving probiotic approaches to microbiota modulation in inflammatory bowel disease.

Premal Vaghela, Bhavarth Dave, Akshada Dabhade, Rohitas Deshmukh, Bhupendra Prajapati, Omar Awad Alsaidan, Suhaskumar Patel, Ankush Mehta, Anup Singh, Kiran Dudhat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Combined ProbioticMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Premal VaghelaDepartment of Pharmacology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Opp. Gujarat University, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India.
Bhavarth DaveDepartment of Pharmacology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Opp. Gujarat University, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India.
Akshada DabhadeDepartment of Pharmacology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Opp. Gujarat University, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India.
Rohitas DeshmukhInstitute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India.
Bhupendra PrajapatiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Parul Institute of Pharmacy, Parul University, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, 391760, India. bhupen27@gmail.com.
Omar Awad AlsaidanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, 72341, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Suhaskumar PatelAmneal Pharmaceutical, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Ankush MehtaMarwadi University Research Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360003, India.
Anup SinghUniversity Center for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Punjab, 140413, India.
Kiran DudhatSchool of Pharmacy, RK University, Kasturbadham, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360020, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) that occurs due to several factors, including, but not limited to, gut microbiota dysbiosis, immune dysregulation, and environmental factors. Despite significant advances in IBD pharmacotherapy, patients often experience treatment failures due to suboptimal treatment responses, frequent relapses, and are also susceptible to developing several adverse effects (AEs), highlighting the need for developing alternative therapies. A growing body of evidence necessitates the importance of maintaining gut microbiome homeostasis, which is commonly disrupted in IBD. Probiotics have emerged as promising adjunctive IBD therapies due to their capacity to modulate immune responses, restore gut microbial balance, and preserve mucosal barrier integrity. Multiple probiotic strains, including Escherichia coli (E. coli) Nissle 1917, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum), Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii (S. boulardii), and combination formulations, such as VSL#3 (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus thermophilus), have demonstrated superior efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in comparison with placebo and comparable efficacy with conventional treatments, such as mesalazine. While the efficacy of probiotics has been demonstrated in UC through several clinical studies, evidence supporting their use in CD remains inconsistent, with studies yielding mixed or inconclusive results. This highlights the necessity for additional carefully designed, large-scale studies specifically targeting CD patients to better understand the therapeutic potential of probiotics in a broader context. Finally, emerging innovations in genetic engineering and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/ CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology offer exciting prospects for the development of precision probiotics, which could possess both diagnostic and treatment benefits and further expand the clinical utility of probiotics in IBD treatment.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeInflammatory Bowel DiseasesProbioticsDysbiosisHumansCrohn’s DiseaseGut microbiotaInflammatory bowel diseaseProbioticsUlcerative Colitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.