ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026
Meniscal Root Fixation Method for Meniscus Transplantation: is There a Superior Technique?
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMeniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is a well-established option for young, active patients with symptomatic functional meniscal deficiency, aiming to restore knee function and delay the progression of degenerative changes. This review provides an overview of available root fixation techniques and contextualizes their clinical outcomes to help surgeons select the most suitable method for individual patients. RECENT
findingsMultiple fixation approaches, including all–soft-tissue, bony fixation (bone plug or bone bridge), and hybrid techniques have demonstrated significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and pain reduction. Bony fixation may reduce or equalize graft extrusion relative to soft-tissue methods, though the clinical significance of extrusion remains uncertain. While functional outcomes and long-term survivorship appear similar across techniques, soft-tissue fixation may carry a slightly higher rate of graft tears and complications. Long-term follow-up reveals that osteoarthritis progression and graft degeneration can still occur. Hybrid fixation techniques combine bony and all-soft-tissue root fixation to leverage the advantages of both methods. It is important to address related conditions such as bone malalignment and ligament instability. Overall, MAT provides durable improvements in knee function and quality of life regardless of fixation method. Optimal results depend not only on the fixation technique but also on addressing concomitant pathologies, such as ligamentous instability and malalignment, with osteotomy playing a key role in protecting the graft when necessary. As no single fixation method has proven superior, further research is required to clarify the ideal strategy and the true clinical impact of graft extrusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.