ArticleScientific reports2026
Identifying the causal effects of photovoltaic installations on grassland productivity using double machine learning: a case study in inner Mongolia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Driven by the global energy transition and the “dual-carbon” goals, the rapid deployment of large-scale photovoltaic (PV) installations has profoundly reshaped land surface processes. This transformation is particularly pronounced in arid and semi-arid grassland ecosystems, where the potential ecological impacts of PV construction remain both critical and controversial. However, most existing studies rely primarily on correlation analyses, which fail to accurately identify the true causal effects of PV installations on ecosystem productivity. In this study, we focus on typical grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China, integrating multi-source remote sensing datasets including MODIS net primary productivity (NPP), meteorological, topographic, and anthropogenic factors. A double machine learning (DML) approach is employed within a quasi-experimental framework to quantify the ecological causal effects of PV construction. The results reveal that the average treatment effect (ATE) of PV installation on grassland NPP is − 0.00427 (p > 0.05), indicating a statistically insignificant overall impact. Nevertheless, substantial spatial heterogeneity exists: approximately 62.1% of PV sites exhibit positive ecological effects, whereas 37.9% show negative ones. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) based analysis further identifies that the spatial variability of PV-induced ecological effects is primarily regulated by environmental factors such as distance to water bodies, mean annual temperature, potential evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and drought index. This study demonstrates the effectiveness and advantages of the DML framework in identifying causal ecological interventions. The findings provide a scientific basis for implementing “ecology-prioritized, site-specific” PV development strategies and highlight the necessity of integrating ecological baseline assessments and spatially precise management to achieve a synergy between energy security and ecosystem conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.