ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Outcome of lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure in a retrospective cohort of patients.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on 'Outcome of lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure in a retrospective cohort of patients'.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Response to Comment on "Outcome of lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure in a retrospective cohort of patients", by Min Ly et al., updates in surgery https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02660-4.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChronic anal fissures (CAF) is a common cause of severe anorectal pain in adults causing poor quality of life. In case of failure of conservative treatments, lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is an effective cure. We aimed to analyse the outcomes of LIS in a consecutive patients' series operated in a high volume Surgical Coloproctology Unit.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 422 patients with CAF undergoing surgical treatment between January 2015 and December 2019 at our Surgical Coloproctology Unit. Patients over the age of 18, not responding or recurring after a standard course of nifedipine ointment were included. Score of anal pain, bleeding, incontinence score, bowel habit was recorded before the operation and at 10th day and two months after treatment. After a mean follow-up of 48.7 months same data were recorded by a phone call on 362 patients available.
resultsSurgical treatment resulted in sharp and fast improvement of anal pain. Male patients, those complaining of constipation and those younger than 35 yr showed less improvement at short term. Postoperative complications included 3 cases of early postoperative bleeding, 3 abscesses at surgical wound and persisting postoperative bleeding in 28 cases (median 4 days). A mild, transient, faecal incontinence was reported at first post-operative visit in females compared to males and in patients older than 50 yrs. compared to younger (p < 0.001). At two months follow up visit 97.5% of patients reported absence of pain, normal continence and thus patients' satisfaction was very high. Nine patients (8 males) complained of persisting post-operative pain and had the fissure unhealed at two months follow up. At long term follow-up no patient complained of recurrent symptoms of anal fissure, continence was normal in all.
conclusionsThe surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure by means of lateral internal sphincterotomy gives excellent results with prompt resolution of anal pain. A standardized approach, surgeon's experience and high volume of cases may represent contributing factors for a good outcome, minimizing complications and recurrence. Normal bowel function contributes to improve and preserve results of surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41644813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.