Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644785›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Examining speakers' subjective and bio-behavioral responses to audience-induced social-evaluative threat via immersive VR.

Sue Lim, Ralf Schmälzle, Gary Bente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sue LimThe Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, 100 N. University St., West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. lim547@purdue.edu.
Ralf SchmälzleDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Gary BenteDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2302608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Success in public speaking hinges on engaging an audience, which involves a high-stakes social interaction process that remains a significant source of anxiety and stress for many. Using a virtual-reality (VR)-based experimental paradigm, we tested how speakers delivering scientific talks perceive and respond to supportive vs. unsupportive audiences. We collected behavioral (gaze, paralinguistics, motion expressiveness/openness), physiological (heart rate, electroencephalography, breathing rate, pupil dilation), and self-report measures to assess audience effects. The unsupportive audience elicited greater negative affect, arousal, and anxiety, and higher perceived cognitive and social effort. Physiologically and behaviorally, speaking to the unsupportive audience decreased the speaking rate. Acoustic analyses further indicated greater emotional arousal and vocal dominance in the unsupportive condition. These findings highlight VR combined with physiological measurement as a powerful approach for investigating audience effects and social-communication processes, with clear implications for augmenting social intelligence and communication skills.

Indexed as

SpeechVirtual RealityAnxietyArousalCommunicationEmotionsFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleSocial BehaviorSocial InteractionYoung AdultCommunication apprehensionPublic speakingScience communicationSocial cognitionSocial-evaluative threatVirtual reality (VR)

Identifiers

PMID41644785
PMCPMC12936056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.