ArticleScientific reports2026
Differences in AUTOS- and FTND-assessed dependence on various tobacco products among Chinese current tobacco/nicotine users.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combustible cigarettes remain the dominant tobacco product in China, although use of emerging tobacco/nicotine products such as electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), smokeless tobacco and nicotine pouches (NPs) is increasing. However, their addictive potential is not well understood. We conducted an online survey (June-September 2025) among 5,901 adult tobacco/nicotine users in China, assessing dependence using the Autonomy Over Tobacco Scale (AUTOS) and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). General linear regression indicated that EC-only users had the lower AUTOS scores (18.32 ± 6.84), while poly-users, especially cigarette + EC users, showed the higher AUTOS (21.61 ± 6.46) and FTND scores (4.06 ± 2.10), compared with cigarette-only users (AUTOS: 20.41 ± 7.02, FTND: 3.63 ± 2.26). Similarly, individuals using ECs plus HTPs (4.79 ± 2.39), cigarettes plus ECs plus HTPs (4.77 ± 1.70), or other combinations (4.76 ± 2.02) exhibited higher FTND scores than cigarette-only users. Familiarity with tobacco/nicotine products and perceived social facilitation were positively associated with both AUTOS and FTND, while perceptions of addictiveness, quitting difficulty, and health risk were positively related to AUTOS. These findings highlight multidimensional dependence, encompassing psychological and physiological dimensions, and reflect influences of diverse product use and cognitive perceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.