Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644678›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Semi-supervised multi-class pneumonia classification using a CNN-cascade forest framework.

P Muthukumaraswamy, T Yuvaraj, R Krishnamoorthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P MuthukumaraswamyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Kings Engineering College, Chennai, 602117, India. muthukumaraswamy@kingsedu.ac.in.
T YuvarajDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600069, India.
R KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Information Technology, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600069, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging diagnosis of pneumonia must be accurate at distinguishing between the various disease subtypes but must be resistant to sparse annotated evidence as well as cross-imaging variability. The current deep learning methods are mostly univariate and binary-classification, which limits their clinical use. As a solution to these shortcomings, this paper suggests a semi-supervised CNN-Enhanced Cascade Forest (CE-Cascade) scheme to classify multi-class pneumonia based on X-ray and CT images of the chest. Based on the approach proposed, a convolutional neural network will first be used to test the medical images to extract discriminative deep features and the resultant features will be refined by a cascade forest to detect hierarchal and multi-scale patterns with great significance in terms of pneumonia detection. A semi-supervised pseudo-labelling strategy is also incorporated in order to competently utilize unlabelled data and better generalization with scarce annotation requirements. The framework is tested over a data set that consists of 4578 chest X-ray and CT images that are divided into categories of bacterial, viral, fungal, general pneumonia, and normal. The experimental findings prove that the given CE-Cascade model reaches the overall classification rate of 98.86 that is higher than some state-of-the-art deep learning systems. Findings validate that semi-supervised learning with the integration of CNN and Cascade Forest to create a robust and clinically meaningful method to classify multi-classes of pneumonia is automated.

Indexed as

PneumoniaAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedCNNCT scanDeep cascade forestGcForestMedical imagingPneumoniaPseudo-labellingSemi-supervised learningX-ray

Identifiers

PMID41644678
PMCPMC12929596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.