Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644624›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Verifying Urdu news authenticity using deep learning with concatenated BERT and GloVe embedding.

Asif Feroz, Waseem Abbasi, Muhammad Zeeshan Babar, Abeer Aljohani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asif FerozDepartment of Computer Science & IT, Superior University, Sargodha Campus, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Waseem AbbasiDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan. waseemabbasi97@gmail.com.
Muhammad Zeeshan BabarHeriot Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK. m.babar@hw.ac.uk.
Abeer AljohaniDepartment of Computer Science and Information,, Applied College, Taibah University, Madinah, 42353, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fake news has a significant effect on reader perceptions and is therefore a serious problem. It is difficult to differentiate between fake and real news as the number of News platforms on social media are growing daily. This work aims to create a complete fake news detection mechanism for Pakistani news by using many fact-checked APIs. A total of 14,178 real and fake news items from fifteen different regions and sections of reputable and authoritative Urdu newspapers and news broadcasting websites in Pakistan are included in the dataset. We evaluate the dataset via three deep learning models RoBERTa, XLM-RoBERTa and mBERT are embedded with concatenated BERT and GloVe. For the training of the selected models, we first use an extensive multilingual dataset. The results of the proposed models are as follows: evaluated via performance metrics such as the F1 score, accuracy, precision and recall. XLM-RoBERTa with concatenated GloVe embedding outperforms with an F1 score of 0.956, accuracy of 0.962, precision of 0.932 and recall of 0.940. A comparative analysis of the latest machine learning and deep learning models is also done. The latest Urdu benchmark dataset shows that the XLM-RoBERTa model with Concatenated BERT and GloVe embedding outperforms these models for Urdu fake news detection.

Indexed as

Deep learningFake newsGloVeTrue newsUFNDUrdu news

Identifiers

PMID41644624
PMCPMC12923771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.