Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644611›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Sex differences in the development of object imagery abilities across age groups.

Maria Kozhevnikov, Alessia Bonavita, Laura Piccardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria KozhevnikovDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. psymaria@nus.edu.sg.
Alessia BonavitaFaculty of Law, Giustino Fortunato University, 82100, Benevento, Italy.
Laura PiccardiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. laura.piccardi@uniroma1.it.

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore Y2023-FRC1-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in spatial abilities, such as the capacity to mentally rotate objects and manipulate them in space, are well-documented, typically emerging around age 13, with males consistently showing an advantage in response speed over females. However, little is known about the sex differences in the development of object imagery ability—the ability to mentally visualize the appearance of objects in terms of color and shape. Given neuroscience evidence that the ventral pathway, associated with object imagery, develops differently from the dorsal pathway involved in spatial processing, we hypothesized that the development of sex differences would vary between these two domains. In this study, we examined the development of three components of object imagery ability (shape, color, and texture) across four different age groups (13, 14, 15, and adults aged 18–35). A sample of 514 secondary school students from Singapore and 323 adults from the National University of Singapore were administered a series of spatial and object imagery tests. Females outperformed males in texture and shape imagery, and these differences remained consistent across all age groups and in adults, independent of specialization, suggesting a developmental pattern distinct from spatial ability.

Indexed as

ImaginationSex CharacteristicsSpace PerceptionAdolescentAdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsYoung AdultCognitive developmentCross-age comparisonObject imagerySex differencesSpatial imagery

Identifiers

PMID41644611
PMCPMC12929688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.