ArticleScientific reports2026
Sex differences in the development of object imagery abilities across age groups.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differences in spatial abilities, such as the capacity to mentally rotate objects and manipulate them in space, are well-documented, typically emerging around age 13, with males consistently showing an advantage in response speed over females. However, little is known about the sex differences in the development of object imagery ability—the ability to mentally visualize the appearance of objects in terms of color and shape. Given neuroscience evidence that the ventral pathway, associated with object imagery, develops differently from the dorsal pathway involved in spatial processing, we hypothesized that the development of sex differences would vary between these two domains. In this study, we examined the development of three components of object imagery ability (shape, color, and texture) across four different age groups (13, 14, 15, and adults aged 18–35). A sample of 514 secondary school students from Singapore and 323 adults from the National University of Singapore were administered a series of spatial and object imagery tests. Females outperformed males in texture and shape imagery, and these differences remained consistent across all age groups and in adults, independent of specialization, suggesting a developmental pattern distinct from spatial ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.