ArticleScientific reports2026
A deep learning approach to emotionally intelligent AI for improved learning outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on contextual sentiment recognition based on neural encoding and decoding and knowledge guidance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence-driven educational systems have largely prioritised cognitive adaptation, often neglecting the critical role of learners' emotional states in shaping engagement and learning outcomes. To address this limitation, this study proposes a multimodal, emotion-aware deep learning framework designed to integrate emotional intelligence into intelligent learning environments. The framework jointly analyses facial expressions, speech characteristics, and textual responses to infer learners' emotional states and models the interdependencies among these modalities through a graph-based fusion mechanism. The proposed approach is evaluated using benchmark emotion datasets, namely AffectNet and IEMOCAP, to assess its capability to recognise emotional patterns and support adaptive feedback during learning interactions. Experimental results demonstrate that incorporating emotional awareness leads to substantial improvements in learner engagement, emotional regulation, and task persistence when compared with conventional cognition-focused systems. The framework achieves consistently high emotion recognition performance, particularly for positive and neutral affective states, and shows robust generalisation across different emotion categories. User study outcomes further suggest that learners perceive the system as more supportive and responsive due to its emotional adaptability. In addition to performance evaluation, the study discusses key ethical considerations associated with emotion-aware educational technologies, including data privacy, informed consent, and responsible deployment. Overall, the findings underscore the potential of multimodal emotional intelligence to advance the development of more empathetic, adaptive, and effective artificial intelligence-based educational systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.